Can Cursor actually help with QA, or is it mainly useful for developers?
Fair question.
Most of what we see around Cursor is about building features faster.
But QA has a very different problem.
It is not just: “Write this test.”
It is a lot more than that.
That’s where Cursor starts becoming interesting for QA.
Not as a shortcut to blindly generate more tests.
But as a way to bring more context into testing workflows, reduce repetitive work, and make automation decisions faster.
That’s why Filip Hric’s upcoming workshop on “AI-Powered Quality Engineering with Cursor” feels worth checking out.
The session goes beyond basic prompting and shows how Cursor can fit into real QA workflows.
It covers how to use Cursor for test automation, choose the right interaction mode, manage project context, work with longer testing conversations, create rules, build reusable workflows, and make AI-assisted testing more reliable.
You can register here: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/ai-powered-quality-engineering-with-cursor-tickets-1989817941026?aff=Vald&discount=VLAD40
Discount code: VLAD40
And the best part is, this is not just a theory-led session.
You’ll walk away with practical workflows you can start applying to your own testing projects right after the workshop.
